• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Adidas vs. FC Barcelona: The Power of the Three (registered) Stripes

21. March 2017

FC Barcelona has backed down from a trademark fight with the well-known sportswear company adidas by abandoning their trademark application filed in May 2015. The Spanish Football Club tried to register a trademark that consists of a square containing three (from seven in total) vertical stripes in garnet. Consequently the German sports company had filed a notice of opposition to Barca’s trademark application.

 

FC-Barcelona-Adidas-Three-Stripes

Never one to shy away from defending its brand, Adidas had filed a notice of opposition to FC Barcelona’s trademark application. It contends that its iconic three-stripe mark precedes Barcelona’s mark and therefore makes it invalid. The mark consists of a square containing seven vertical stripes. The 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th stripes from the left are blue, and the remaining three stripes are garnet.

 “[Barcelona’s Mark] incorporates parallel stripes in a manner confusingly similar to the ‘Three-stripe’ mark in appearance and overall commercial impression”

Adidas has been using its three-stripe pattern in the United States and worldwide since 1952 for footwear and 1967 for apparel. “Since introducing the Three-Stripe Mark [in 1952], adidas has spent millions of dollars promoting the mark and products bearing the mark. As a result of adidas’s extensive use and promotion of the Three-Stripe Mark, adidas has built up and now owns extremely valuable goodwill that is symbolized by the mark.

The purchasing public has come to associate the Three-Stripe Mark with adidas.”

Furthermore adidas added: “Consumers familiar with the footwear and apparel long associated with adidas’ Three-Stripe Mark are likely to assume that the goods in Class 25 [footwear and apparel] and Class 28 [sporting goods/equipment] offered under FC Barcelona’s trademark originate from the same source, or that they are affiliated, connected, or associated with adidas.” As a result, “any defect, objection, or fault found with FC Barcelona’s products marketed under the FC Barcelona trademark necessarily would reflect on and seriously injure adidas’s reputation.”

Now, the football club appears to have backed down; FC Barcelona withdrew its trademark application with adidas’s consent. Consequently, the opposition has been dismissed. Barcelona is sponsored by adidas’ biggest competitor Nike.

 

When one files a notice of opposition for a Trademark

FC-Barcelona-Trademark-Application
Status of the Barca’s Trademark Application // Source: USPTO

 

Before a trademark may be registered with the USPTO, a number of requirements must be satisfied.

If the examining attorney raises no objections to registration, or if the applicant overcomes all objections, the examining attorney will approve the mark for publication in the Official Gazette, a weekly publication of the USPTO. The USPTO will send a notice of publication to the applicant stating the date of publication. After the mark is published in the Official Gazette, any party who believes it may be damaged by registration of the mark has thirty (30) days from the publication date to file either an opposition to registration or a request to extend the time to oppose.

If no opposition is filed or if the opposition is unsuccessful, the application enters the next stage of the registration process.

 

These cases may also be interesting for you:

  • Trademark Setback: Louboutin cannot protect his red soles in Switzerland
  • Jägermeister loses Community Design Dispute against EUIPO
  • General Court confirms: Body-builder silhouette cannot be trademarked
  • European Court: Gucci loses two trademark appeals against Guess
  • EUROKURIER-Logo: You shall not imitate an official emblem!

 

Do you want to register your trademark?

Our lawyers advise you individually and together with you develop the right strategy to protect your brand.

Make a non-binding call back-appointment today!

Source: USPTO – FC Barcelona Trademark Application / adidas’ notice of Opposition

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconadidas,  FC Barcelona

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]