• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Tiffany & Co victorious in trademark litigation case versus Costco

15. September 2017

US discount warehouse chain Costco has been ruled by a US district judge for trademark infringement of Tiffany & Co. by selling “Tiffany” engagement rings. Costco Wholesale Corp. must pay approximately US $19.4 million in damages to the luxury juweler. Moreover the discount warehouse chain is forbidden to use “Tiffany” as a standalone term for selling engagement rings that were marketed using Tiffany’s name.

DiamantringThe case Costco Wholesale Corp. versus Tiffany & Co. is a long-running legal battle, it has been started on Valentine’s Day in 2013.  Tiffany & Co. sued Costco for infringement, and certainly the date Valentine’s Day for opening the law case was an additional advertisment for diamond engagement rings of Tiffany & Co. The luxury jeweler was confirmed by the New York court already in 2016. The decision of the New York court was that Costco should pay back its profits, which it made from the rings.  Costco was ordered to pay $13.75m in damages and legal costs for infringing the trademark. But because Costco has been accused of selling about 2,500 of the counterfeit rings, in the new decision of the US District Court, Southern District of New York, the damage was increased. The court distinguishes between compensatory and punitive damages. The amount of the punitive damages is not changened in comparison with the judgement in 2016, but the compensatory amount was increased from US 5,5 million to US 11,1 million.

 

Is using the assoziation of a famous brand a trademark infringement?

fingerringCostco had argued that they hadn’t sold counterfeit and imitation for real. Their customers must not have the association of an original luxury ring by Tiffany, because the rings were not sold using Tiffany’s trademark blue boxes. And Costco claimed that “Tiffany” described the type of ring rather than claiming to be made by Tiffany & Co. and therefore it could been used. The court didn’t accept this argumentation, however. And it decided that in addition to the payment of damages Costco is barred from using “Tiffany” standing alone without attributes like “setting,” “set” or “style”. Nevertheless Costco said in a statement that it plans to appeal the ruling, CNN reported.

Costco Wholesale Corp. used not only Tiffany’s name for luxury association, but other brand names as well. On September 14th 2017, for example watches by Breitling, Cartier and Rolex were on sale on Costco’s website (https://www.costco.com). This kind of business strategy implies risks concerning getting accused of trademark infringement. But of course, not all businesses choose to register their trademark. Or sometimes they are even to late and somebody else has already registered the word and figurative mark. Especially in China this can be a significant danger, because in Chinese trademark law enshrines the principle of prior application; where two or more applicants apply to register identical or similar trademarks in respect of the same or similar goods, the Trademark Office will approve for publication the mark with the earliest application date and reject the other trademark applications.

European trademark law tries to protect famous marks

In Europe the trademark law tries to protect famous marks: The use of a registered European trademark in comparative advertisement can be considered as an IP-infringement and famous marks with extensive reputation may constitute a ground for cancellation, even for goods or services not included in trademark registrations. Lot’s of law cases and decisions about infringement of intellectual property show the will in the EU to grant reliable protection for patents and trademarks.

Maybe those cases about famous marks and IP-infringement are interesting for you:

  • Another copying of brand design: Gucci sues fashion chain Forever 21
  • Right after launch in the US: Kroger sues Lidl for trademark infringement
  • Chinese Court ruled infringement of domestic shoemakers: “N” logo and footwear New Balance
  • Retro video game vs. modern advertising clip: Atari accused Nestlé of copyright infringement

 

You want international protection for your trademark or your patent?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. We will help you protect your Intellectual Property rights. Additionally, our lawyers are licensed to represent you at every German court!

Take your chance and request a call-back without any obligations at:

CAT-call_en
 

Sources:

magazine The Trademark Lawyer

CNN

pictures: Hans / pixabay.com / CC0 License ||  ColiN00B /pixabay.com / CCO License  || Fingerringe Hans / Pixabay.com / CCO License

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconProduct- and Trademark piracy Tag iconU.S.

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Product- and Trademark piracy

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021
  • EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform 18. February 2021
  • BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest 16. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

25. January 2021
Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

11. December 2020
Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

3. December 2020
Käpt’n Iglo: maritime advertising in court

Käpt’n Iglo: maritime advertising in court

10. November 2020
German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

2. November 2020
3 D Printing is trend – but infringement of IP rights? Part #1 of 2

3 D Printing is trend – but infringement of IP rights? Part #1 of 2

8. September 2020
Amazon not responsible for unfair advertising in Amazon affiliates

Amazon not responsible for unfair advertising in Amazon affiliates

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form