• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Patent trolls in US: Plaintiffs can no longer choose court

13. June 2017

Many large companies in the US are victims of so-called patent trolls. This can be not only annoying but also very expensive for affected companies. A new decision of the US Supreme Court now makes it easier for them to defend themselves against patent infringement lawsuits.

Patent trolls are annoying the big ones

Patent_Trolls_TrollUntil now, companies in the USA could be sued regardless of their place of incorporation nationwide at any court. The patent trolls has so far been made use of and chose the more favorable courts in other parts of the country to file lawsuits against large companies. Especially big tech companies like Apple and Google have been “trolled” again and again.

But what are patent trolls exactly? Patent trolls are owner of often questionable patents, which do not produce their own products and try to collect money with sometimes far-fetched arguments. They are threatening the companies with lawsuits for patent infringement, but which they rarely have to raise. The companies usually prefer to pay immediatly than to be involved in a much more expensive process.

After more and more companies, including ebay and kickstarter, had complained that they were sued in courts that were up to 1000 km away, the desire for a new regulation was big.

 

Old law in force again: special regulations for patent law

US-Supreme-Court

In the case of the food companies TC Heartland vs Kraft Foods, the Supreme Court has now decided that companies can only be sued in the state, in which they are incorporated. Originally in 1897 there was already a standard (U.S.C. 28 § 1400) which determines in the case of patent complaints the registered seat of the defendant as court of jurisdiction. In 1957, the Supreme Court further strengthened the norm in which the “registered seat” was defined as the place where the company was registered.

There is, however, a further rule of 1948 (U.S.C. 28 § 1391) for civil actions, which has somewhat broadened the notion of  the registered seat of the company. The rule used by the patent trolls has now been braked. The Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the 1957 law continues to apply to the special regulations of the patent laws.

 

Less work for the texas courts

The decision is celebrated in the USA, because it is now easier to defend against patent infringement laws. Affected companies may be more likely to engage in a process rather than pay directly. That would make the trolls more difficult to get much quick money. There could also be a huge change in patent cases from Texas to Delaware. In Texas, 40% of the patent lawsuits have been negotiated, as they have the greatest prospect of success in patent control. In Delaware, many companies are registered because of the business-friendly laws.

 

Patent trolls will not be stopped

Representatives of inventors and patents are critical, as the decision will facilitate patent infringement and piracy. The problem that the party that is victorious at the US court must bear the costs of the proceedings itself will also persist. In connection with the fact that patent infringement can be prosecuted, even if one does not use the patent, there is still the prospect of many unnerving patent lawsuits.

 

Sources:

thefashionlaw.com

Pixabay.com

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconPatent-Troll

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

2. March 2021
BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form