• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Patent infringement before Chinese IP court: Huawei victorious against Samsung

18. January 2018

Huawei was victorious in a license dispute against Samsung concerning the mobile smartphone communication at the Shenzhen Intermediate Court in China. This is the second time that the Chinese smartphone manufacturer has been able to assert itself as a plaintiff before a Chinese court.

License dispute over two Huawei patents

HuaweiThis process focused on two patents of the Chinese smartphone manufacturer Huawei (ZL2011101010102626269715.3 and ZL20101013137731.2). The court in Shenzhen found that both were essential to the LTE 4G standard, and therefore found that the Samsung products allegedly infringed the LTE 4G standard. A large part of the proceedings, however, also involved examining the licensing behaviour of the two parties to the dispute. Ultimately, the IP Court ruled that Samsung had not acted correctly in its approach to the licensing negotiations. Samsung is explicitly accused of having used delayed tactics in license negotiations with Huawei. Huawei had proposed several licensing offers from 2011 to 2017, while Samsung only made one counter-offer and allegedly replied several times too late. In 2016, Huawei also offered a dispute settlement to its Korean competitor, but Samsung rejected it.

A longstanding bitter dispute

ShenzhenThe verdict in Shenzhen is only one more stage in the long battle between the two Asian smartphone manufacturers. Huawei also emerged victorious in April 2017, when the Quanzhou Immediate People’s Court also joined the Chinese company and ordered Samsung to pay 11.6 million dollars.

In 2016 Huawei filed several patent infringement suits in both the United States and China. Huawei claimed that Samsung used its mobile technology and software patents without licenses. In the lawsuit filed by Huawei in the United States in 2016, Samsung was accused of unauthorized use of patents on wireless connectivity for mobile phones.

In a direct response to Huaweis’s accusations, Samsung also filed a lawsuit against the Chinese in 2016 before the Beijing IP Court. The IP court officially informed that Samsung Huawei and a department store in Beijing have sued Samsung Huawei and claimed 161 million yuan (24.14 million dollars) for damages. Samsung saw several patents infringed, including Huawei’s Mate 8 and Honor smartphones. The decision is still pending.

 

 

It was not until December 2017 that the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen set up an intellectual property court (IP) and a separate finance court. IP cases will be dealt with there under the jurisdiction of the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court. The large number of financial and technological companies in the region has led to a growing number of financial and IP cases. China began setting up special courts for intellectual property in 2014. By the end of 2014, three exclusive intellectual property courts were established in China at Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. In 2017, sections for IP were added under the jurisdiction of the Intermediate People’s Courts in Chengdu, Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan and finally in Shenzhen.

Under the current Shenzhen ruling, the court ruled that Samsung should cease manufacturing and selling equipment with the LTE 4G standard technology and pay a small court fee. In practical terms, this means that Samsung will probably have to seek a license agreement itself with the competitor  – or decide to appeal. A list of phone models has not yet been made available. Also missing is the court’s statement, which will provide several hundred pages. In the highly competitive sector of smartphones and mobile communications, even more legal proceedings are pending.

Do you want to read more of such articles? Then enter your e-mail address and click on "Subscribe"

Facebook

Mit dem Laden des Beitrags akzeptieren Sie die Datenschutzerklärung von Facebook.
Mehr erfahren

Beitrag laden

 

Sources:

abc news

bubuliao /pixabay.com / CCO License  || tianya1223 /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconLicenses,  Patent Law Tag iconChina,  Huawei,  Samsung,  Shenzhen

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Licenses

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.