• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

ECJ ruling on parallel imports: Is re-labelling considered repackaging?

18. May 2018

Is prior information and the provision of a package design to the trademark owner a prerequisite for parallel imports also for medical devices? The European Court of Justice yesterday ruled in the conflict over the unreconciled re-import of the bandaging material Debrisoft. But important questions for parallel imports in the EU were also assessed: the gradual differences between repackaging and re-labelling.

Does a new label count as repackaging?

re-packagingAccording to current case-law, a trade mark proprietor may oppose the repackaging of products bearing the trade mark. But is the re-import of a medical product also considered repackaged if the parallel importer simply applies an additional label to the original product? The Court found that the concept of repackaging includes the re-labelling of branded medicinal products (judgment of 26 April 2007, Boehringer Ingelheim and Others, C-348/04, EU:C:2007:249, marginal 28). However, the trademark owner cannot object to this if the packaging clearly states by whom the goods have been repacked and who is their manufacturer.

The background facts

Lohmann & Rauscher International is the trademark owner of the original proceedings concerning the dressing material Debrisoft. Parallel importer is the Austrian-based Junek Europ distributor, which reimports sanitary products exported to Austria, including to Germany. In a German pharmacy, a box of the product Debrisoft was sold in the original box, and with an additional Junek Europ distribution label. According to the court, the sticker was affixed to an unprinted part of the box and did not conceal the Lohmann & Rauscher International trademark. However, as Lohmann & Rauscher had not been informed about the changed product packaging, they sued Junek Europ sales for infringement of the Debrisoft brand.

Both the Düsseldorf Regional Court upheld the action. The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf dismissed the appeal lodged by Junek Europ-Vertrieb, pointing out that the ban on using the trademark in question only applied to Germany. Junek Europ-Vertrieb then appealed to the Federal Court of Justice. So the request for a preliminary ruling reached the ECJ.

The ECJ confirms the parallel importer

The Court emphasised that in the reference case Boehringer (judgment of 26 April 2007, Boehringer Ingelheim et al., C-348/04, EU:C:2007:249, marginal 28) the situation was different. In the Boehringer case, there was an “intervention by the parallel importer in which not only was an additional external label affixed to or replaced on the packaging of the drug concerned, but the original packaging was also opened in all cases”.

In the present case, however, the Court considers that it is not a repackaging, because:

  • the packaging of the medical device in question has not been altered
  • the original presentation of the packaging has not been affected
  • the original Lohmann & Rauscher brand was visible
  • Junek Europ’s small sticker identified the parallel importer as responsible for placing on the market, stating his contact details, a bar code and a central pharmaceutical number.

The ECJ therefore confirms the parallel importer Junek Europ-Vertrieb and thus contradicts the Düsseldorf court. The proprietor of a trade mark may not oppose the further distribution of a medical device in its internal and external original packaging by a parallel importer if an additional sticker is placed by the importer which does not pose a risk to the guarantee of origin of the medical device bearing the trade mark.

Parallel import – a topic for you too?

Our law firm has many years of expertise in the pharmaceutical sector. Request a non-binding callback today:

 

 

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: ECLI:EU:C:2018:322

Picture:

bluepills123 /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconHealthcare & Lifesciences,  International Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconbrand,  distribution,  ECJ,  EU,  Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark,  Import,  Intellectual Property,  Junek Europ,  Lohmann & Rauscher International,  medical device,  New labelling,  packaging,  Parallel imports,  re-labelling,  Reimport,  repackaging,  Trademark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Healthcare & Lifesciences

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

7. March 2022
BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt

BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.