• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees' Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Angelika Hempel
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Preserve evidence in IP infringement: Settlement DE and FR

29. August 2019

The comparison of German and French law on the preservation of evidence in IP infringement shows that the procedures are similar, but differ in implementation. In France, the Saisie-contrefaçon allows far-reaching seizure.

In the case of suspected infringements against patent, trademark or design rights, the owner of the intellectual property rights has access to proceedings both in German IP property rights and in international IP law. The comparison of German and French law with regard to the preservation of evidence shows that the procedures are similar – as it should be according to European harmonisation – but differ in their implementation.

Procedures for the preservation of evidence in DE and FR

Under German law, owners of patent and trademark rights can rely on proceedings for the preservation of evidence under, inter alia, § 140 c PatG for patent infringements and § 19 MarkenG for trademarks, as well as on the so-called inspection procedure under § 101a UrhG for copyright infringements.
German law also provides for information claims in the case of suspected patent, trademark or design infringements which can be asserted by means of an injunction.

BeweissicherungThe French procedure for the preservation of evidence, the so-called “Saisie-contrefaçon”, has comparatively low requirements compared to German law. With the “saisie-contrefaçon”, goods and means of production of a suspected infringer can be directly accessed and evidence confiscated with the involvement of a bailiff.
In France, this procedure is widely used to obtain information, preferably also in international patent law proceedings. On the basis of an injunction, the holder of an intellectual property right can instruct the bailiff to secure evidence at any place.
In contrast to German law, it is not only possible to inspect documents or products, but the French bailiff is also entitled to confiscate such goods, samples or specimens and leave them to the right holder to produce evidence. It is therefore a very far-reaching seizure.

 

Saisie-contrefaçon for holders of FR or EU intellectual property rights

The Saisie-contrefaçon can only be used by the holders of French or EU intellectual property rights. In order to conduct the procedure, an application must be submitted to the appropriate French courts, the Tribunaux de grande instance pursuant to Article 716-3 of the Code de la propriété intellectuelle (CPI).
It should be noted that this is also possible in ongoing proceedings. As in German law, the right holder in France must also provide serious evidence of an infringement. In Germany, it must also be proven that the preservation of evidence is necessary in order to be able to assert claims for information, injunctive relief and damages. Such evidence is not required in France. The saisie-contrefaçon explicitly and avowedly serves to secure evidence.

Opposition to seizure

If one does not agree with such a seizure, one can lodge an objection against it according to both German and French law. In Germany, opposition can be lodged before the appeal court. In France, the proceedings would be continued as preliminary injunction proceedings with an opposition before the Tribunal de grande instance.

Tight time limits for the saisie-contrefaçon

In addition, the Saisie-contrefaçon in France is also subject to strict deadlines. Once the saisie-contrefaçon has been implemented, the right holder must bring an action on the merits within 20 working days or 31 calendar days, otherwise the saisie-contrefaçon will be declared null and void at the request of the defendant. In such a case, the defendant may also claim damages from the claimant. The date of transmission of the statement of claim by the judicial officer responsible for service shall be decisive for the calculation of the time limit.

In Germany, on the other hand, a time limit for bringing an action is set only at the request of the defendant.

Conclusion

Despite European harmonization in patent and trademark law, despite numerous EU directives which also harmonize national legislation for IP rights, there are still differences in the actual implementation in the individual EU member states.
It should therefore always be considered whether a European trademark or patent protection ensures the desired protection status, even if an national IP protection in Europe initially appears sufficient. As soon as your product is marketed in several countries, the IP rights there are valid.

Do you need assistance with IP rights violations or a preliminary injunction?

Our lawyers are experienced in European and international IP law. If you are interested, please contact us – we will be happy to advise you!

 

Sources:

Settled law in Germany and France

Image:

Alexas_Fotos / pixabay.com / CCO License | geralt / pixabay.com / CCO License

  • share  
  • share  
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 
Ajax Loader
100% 0%

Category iconDesign Law,  Product- and Trademark piracy,  Trademark Law Tag iconpatent infringement,  Germany,  trademark infringement,  copyright infringement,  france,  Intellectual Property Rights,  IP infringement,  preliminary injunction,  opposition,  Saisie-contrefaçon,  CPI,  design infringement,  preservation of evidence,  deadline for filing a suit,  infringement of intellectual property rights,  opposition to seizure,  confiscation

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • Cannabis mark contrary to public policy 13. December 2019
  • ECJ: Bottle shape is 3D union mark 13. December 2019
  • Restriction of EU collective mark Grüner Punkt 12. December 2019
  • ECJ: Appropriate compensation for unjustified Provisional measures 9. December 2019

Newsletter Subscription

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

13. December 2019
Cannabis mark contrary to public policy

Cannabis mark contrary to public policy

13. December 2019
ECJ: Bottle shape is 3D union mark

ECJ: Bottle shape is 3D union mark

12. December 2019
Restriction of EU collective mark Grüner Punkt

Restriction of EU collective mark Grüner Punkt

6. December 2019
Trademark infringement in China: new trademark law in force

Trademark infringement in China: new trademark law in force

5. December 2019
German Balsamico confirmed by ECJ

German Balsamico confirmed by ECJ

3. December 2019
Checkered design: Registration decisive, not the use of a trademark

Checkered design: Registration decisive, not the use of a trademark

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Subscription

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf anfordern

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutz-Erklärung.
Das System verwendet Cookies, die uns eine Nutzeranalyse unserer Website ermöglichen.
Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Request a call back

To be able to use this offer, you have to consent to the storage of your personal data. We will treat your personal data as strictly confidential and will only use them to improve our company’s marketing. Read more in our privacy policy. With consenting to the storage of your personal data, you also consent that we use your email address to send further information to you which might be of interest for you.
The system is using cookies to enable analysis of this website’s users and their interests.