• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

IP, Patent and Trademark protection and Brexit: Facts of the British Intellectual Property Office

26. September 2017

What does an European patent in the UK mean after the brexit? While the political struggle is already underway to extend the withdrawal process, the question of how patents and design applications should be applied for in patent and trademark law is becoming increasingly urgent, so that patent- and trademark protection is still valid in the UK after the brexit.

In response, the British Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has published a clear factual check on intellectual property (IP). At first glance, each topic seems to be dealt with from patent protection to copyright issues. But at second glance, however, it becomes apparent that most of these areas of patent and trademark protection have not yet been clarified for the post-Brexit period. The wording in the factual paper is called “The government is exploring various options…” and “The continued effect of EU Directives and Regulations following our exit from the EU will depend on the terms of our future relationship”.

We look at the IP topics mentioned in the factual check and assess the current status.

Trademark protection

MadridTrademark protection can be applied for at national trademark offices, in Germany at the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA), and for European trademark protection at the Office for European Trademark Protection (EUIPO).

The British factual paper leaves open the extent to which European trademark protection will still be valid in the UK after the Brexit, but stresses that British companies will of course still have European trademark protection through EUIPO registrations. The British are also concerned about whether British IP lawyers and experts may still represent their clients before the EU Intellectual Property Bureau after the Brexit. This too still have to be negotiated.

It is therefore more informative to mention the membership in the Madrid Protocol, which England would like to maintain after the brexite. This is the safest way to protect a trademark in the UK with international trademark protection after brexit. Applications for international trademark protection must be submitted to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

The basis of the international trademark is the so-called Madrid Agreement on the International Registration of Marks (MMA), which was concluded in 1891 by a number of countries, in particular European states. The agreement was supplemented by an additional protocol, PMMA, which was added in 1989 to the Madrid Agreement. This enabled many other countries to join the agreement and extend trademark protection globally (major). Germany is a contracting party to both the MMA and PMMA.
(Source: Info Blog : Madrid Union Assembly Makes Historical Decision)

Design protection

LondonIn the field of design protection, the fact paper also remains open as to whether and how European registered design patents and designs will still be protected in the UK after the brexit. Again, the concrete promise only applies to British companies that will continue to retain their European design protection in the remaining EU states after the Brexit.

The British IPO also refers here to the possible future membership of an international protection agreement. The British government had made clear its intention to ratify the Hague Agreement as a national agreement. It is envisaged that the British could ratify the Hague Agreement on the International Registration of Industrial Designs (HMA) next year.

 

The Hague Agreement on the International Registration of Industrial Designs (HMA) provides that international protection can be applied for for designs. The application is filed with the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA), with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) or with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Geneva.

Important: An international registration with the designation of Germany as the country of protection has the same effect as a design application under the Design Act.
(Quotation: IP Wikipedia www.legal-patent.com (translation from German))

Patent protection

SchottlandIn patent protection, the British Government assures British companies that their patents will continue to be protected by European patents in the EU member states even after brexit. Whether and how registered patents will still be valid in the UK after the brexite is unclear.

The British government rightly refers to the planned European Patent Court in patent protection. In November 2016, the British had announced that they would continue to hold the European Patent Court (Unified Patent Court (UPC) despite the Brexit vote. However, it is still not clear when the UPC will come into force.

Indeed, Westminster has postponed indefinitely the debate on ratification, which was originally planned for July 2017, while the Scottish Parliament is making concrete progress with the ratification of Scotland, which is also necessary. In Germany, too, the final ratification is delayed for an unresolved period of time due to a constitutional complaint by an initially unknown plaintiff.

The European Patent Court court will be responsible for all European patents granted at the time of its establishment. The proceedings before the European Patent Court are intended to replace the previous patent disputes before national courts. With the Euopean Patent Court, it will be possible to finally implement a European patent, if it is violated, in a single procedure throughout the EU. (Quotation: Info Blog: UK after brexit: EU position paper concerning IP law published and the Europaen Patent Court)

copyright

Whether and to what extent works such as music, films, books and photographs remain protected by copyright in the UK after the brexit, remains entirely vague. In this case, the British Government merely refers to worldwide copyright laws that protect British works worldwide.

conclusion

The crucial factor for IP rights in the UK after the brexit is the negotiation between the EU and the UK Government. A few weeks ago, the EU presented a position paper on this subject, which we have already reported on. It remains to be seen how many points from the negotiating document will ultimately be included in binding agreements. Until then, European patent or trademark protection applies to the European countries, both before and after brexit, and we have to wait – and may still hope – for the requirements for patent and trademark protection in the UK after brexit.

Advice on trademarks needed?

All of our attorneys have many year’s experience in trademarks and the protection of intellectual property national and international. Do you have any (further) questions or can we help register your trademark?

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

IP and BREXIT: The facts of the British IPO

Info Blog: Brexit-Effects on the Trademark Licensing Business

WIPO: Goodbye Fee Irregularities – welcome Madrid e-Renewal

Unified Patent Court: Unknown plaintiff stops ratification

WIPO Hague Agreement

pictures: PublicDomainPictures / pixabay.com / CCO License ||  FrankWinkler /pixabay.com / CCO License || NakNakNak / pixabay.com / CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconCopyright,  Overall Tag iconBrexit,  copyright,  Trademark

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Copyright

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

25. October 2021
ECJ: decompiling software to correct bugs

ECJ: decompiling software to correct bugs

26. August 2021
Chinese VW-Käfer causes uproar – design theft?

Chinese VW-Käfer causes uproar – design theft?

22. June 2021
ECJ: (No) liability of Youtube/Google for infringing content

ECJ: (No) liability of Youtube/Google for infringing content

15. June 2021
Top smartphones on the best network: Unique selling advertising?

Top smartphones on the best network: Unique selling advertising?

6. April 2021
Google vs. Oracle: Java API code falls under fair use!

Google vs. Oracle: Java API code falls under fair use!

23. March 2021
ECJ: Digital framing of works protected by copyright

ECJ: Digital framing of works protected by copyright

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.