• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

DUNGEONS & DRAGONS versus DUNGEONS

14. October 2019

In an action for a likelihood of confusion, special attention is paid to whether a well-known mark can be associated with the new mark. Even with a long brand name, of which only a part is registered as a new trademark? The applicant for the word mark DUNGEONS lost such a case.

DUNGEONS & DRAGONS In an action for a likelihood of confusion, special attention is paid to whether a well-known trademark can be associated with the new trademark. Please also read in this context our article No risk of confusion: POST, INFOPOST and ePOST versus InPost.

But what is it like in a long well-known brand name, of which only a part is registered as a new trademark? The applicant for the word mark DUNGEONS, plaintiff Kalypso Media Group GmbH (Germany), lost such a case before the European Court (Court of Justice of the European Union, CJEU) against the earlier Union word mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS. Whether the mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS may even be somewhat descriptive of the goods and services claimed was not relevant for the case. An earlier mark already has a minimal internal distinctiveness because it was registered, explained the CJEU.

The facts

Wizards of the Coast LLC (USA) had filed a notice of opposition against the trade mark application Kalypso Media Group and claimed that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks (pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of EU Regulation 2017/1001). Wizards of the Coast relied on its own earlier well-known mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS. The Opposition Division and also the subsequently appealed Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the opposition. Kalypso Media Group GmbH brought an action against that decision before the CJEU.

Many topics “Dungeons” and “Dragons” on the games market

The applicant claimed that, given the different lengths of the two marks DUNGEONS and DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, there was only ‘some similarity’ between them. In addition, the applicant argued that the themes ‘dungeons’ and ‘dragons’ were very popular on the games market and that there were many games referring to those themes in its name. This shows, the Kalypso Media Group argued, that DUNGEONS & DRAGONS is only one of many similar names and thus has a weakened, below-average distinctive character. The Board of Appeal, in turn, found that the degree of visual and phonetic similarity between the two marks was ‘above average’.

CJEU confirms likelihood of confusion

The CJEU confirmed the decision of the Board of Appeal and rejected the applicant’s objections. The first word element in a word mark consisting of several words is the first word as the most important, the Court explained. The technical comparison of the number of words, elements and syllables of the marks concerned cannot change the fact that the mark applied for fully reproduces the first word of the earlier mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS. However, more similarity than in identical representation is practically impossible.

Even if the distinctive character of the earlier mark had to be taken into account when assessing the likelihood of confusion, this was no more than one element among others to be taken into account in that assessment, the CJEU clarified. The finding that the earlier mark has little distinctive character in itself does not preclude the finding that there is a likelihood of confusion, which has been repeatedly held both by the European Courts ECJ and CJEU.

Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark not relevant

The applicant took the view that the Board of Appeal should have found that there was no likelihood of confusion, taking into account the weak distinctive character of the mark and the high level of attention of the relevant public. The CJEU rejected that finding. The existence of a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public must be assessed globally, taking into account all factors relevant to the circumstances of the case, the Court held. For a Union word mark, the relevant public is the average consumer in the European Union.

There is a likelihood of confusion, at least with regard to the English-speaking part of the relevant public, which perceives the similarity of the marks not only visually and phonetically but also conceptually. Dungeon’ is the concept of a ‘dark underground prison in a castle’ according to the Collins Dictionary.

The action brought by the Kalypso Media Group was therefore dismissed by the CJEU and the refusal to register the word mark DUNGEONS was confirmed.

Do you need assistance in trademark litigation? Or is your trademark contested?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in trademark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you before any court in Germany as well as internationally.
If you are interested, please contact us.


 

 

 

Sources:

Judgement of CJEU “DUNGEONS”, EU:T:2019:739

Image:

Josch13 / www.pixabay.com / CCO License

 

 

  • share  10 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconlikelihood of confusion,  games market,  earlier mark,  DUNGEONS & DRAGONS,  word mark,  DUNGEONS,  Unionwordmark,  earlier well-known mark,  descriptive,  earlier word mark,  distinctive,  long brand names,  long brand name,  wordmark,  part of earlier mark,  Union word mark,  weak distinctive character

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]