• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Avanti: Union figurative mark, general vocabulary or advertising slogan?

24. July 2018

A longstanding dispute over the Union figurative trademark Avanti was recently decided before the Court of Justice of the European Union. Avanti – an imaginative sign or Italian and even German vocabulary? It is also a judgement on the distinctive character of a trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan.

AvantiIn October 2015, the plaintiff, avanti GmbH, applied to the EUIPO for the Avanti trademark as a Union figurative trademark. The registration was refused by the EUIPO in 2016, as was the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO appealed by the applicant.

Union Trademark application was refused

The Board of Appeal justified its refusal that the word’avanti’ was part of Italian and also German vocabulary. Some of the consumers who spoke one of those languages would, despite the figurative element and the colour of the mark applied for, regard it as a promotional indication which is not distinctive in relation to the goods and services in question because of the presence of the word’avanti’. Registration of the mark applied for must therefore be refused pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

The basic case-law on figurative signs is that, in order to assess the distinctiveness of a figurative sign, it must be examined whether the figurative elements in question can lead to a difference for the consumer between the mark applied for and the mere perception of the word elements used.

Verdict confirms the refusal

In its judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) also ruled and dismissed the action.

Unionmark Avanti
Applied Union Mark Avanti

At the center of the argument was the different colored letter v in Avanti. In the applicant’s view, this was not a letter but a stylized OK sign. It is not a letter because it has no different upper and lower case and no vertical symmetry. The court did not follow this view. The entire word “Avanti” is perceived. It did not matter that the v differed from the lines or that it was of a different colour. Nor does the emphasis on the shape and colour of that element alter the fact that that part of the sign applied for will be perceived by the public as a letter ‘v’.

The Court pointed out that signs are devoid of any distinctive character which are unsuitable for distinguishing the origin of the product or service in question from those of other undertakings. This is an absolute ground for refusal pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, even if the grounds for refusal exist only in part of the Union, as in the present case in Italian and German speaking areas.

Advertising slogan devoid of distinctiveness

Furthermore, a trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan is devoid of any distinctive character if it can be perceived as a mere advertising slogan, the CJEU ruled. This is the case with Avanti. For the progress to which the term “avanti” refers and the OK sign both represent positive and promotional advertising slogans in relation to the goods and services in question. The sign in question is perceived in its entirety as a slogan.

The CJEU thus confirms the decision and also the grounds of the EUIPO Board of Appeal and dismisses the applicant (EU:T:2018:24). Avanti cannot be registered as an Union trademark.

Avanti is registered as a 3-D trademark

Avanti fuelOther trademark applications for “Avanti” were more successful. For example, the Austrian oil company “Avanti”, which holds rights to an Avanti 3D Union brand (trade mark number: 1148258), is well-known. As a result, the brand name “Avanti” will certainly become very well known in Germany, as the mineral oil company is planning to build up a network of filling stations at Aldi-Süd stores in Germany – starting in just a few weeks’ time.

 

Are you interested in national or international brand or trademark protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

 

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: EU:T:2018:24

Picture:

Free_Photos /pixabay.com / CCO License  

IADE-Michigo /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconCopyright,  International Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconAvanti,  application refused,  Trademark,  Avanti filling station,  Aldi-Süd,  EUIPO,  Court of Justice of the European Union,  Union figurative mark,  figurative mark,  absolute ground for refusal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Copyright

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]