• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Apple sued by Corephonotics: patent infringement or strike back?

21. November 2017

Strike back? Apple was sued by Isreali Corephonotics for patent infringement. In focus is the excellent camera technology, proceeding in the dual cameras of several iPhones. Corephonotics holds U. S. patents on this technology, they claim. Apple was sued by Corephonotics two weeks ago – with connection of the plaintiff to Samsung.

Apple is accused for using Corephonotics camera technology

iPhoneIsreali camera specialist Corephonotics filed a lawsuit against Apple on 6th november California Northern District Court for patent infringement of four of its patents (5:2017cv06457). The plaintiff accused the well-known iPhone manufacturer of having used the patented camera technology in the iPhone 7 plus and iPhone 8 plus. However, iPhone X is not listed as a harmful product even though it has a dual lens camera, too. The company Corephonotics is now seeking compensation: monetary damages and injunctive relief.

Specifically, the accusation is that Apple has copied the telephoto lens design, the optical zoom method and a procedure for the intelligent fusion of wide-angle and telephoto lenses of the Israelis. For Apple, it is another accusation of infringement of intellectual property rights within a short period of time. In the case about the registered word Animoji, which we reported on, the famous iPhone manufacturer were also sued for trademark infringement.

Spicy: Corephonetics law firm has represented Samsung versus Apple

BoxerBut in the background of this lawsuit there are even more opponents against Apple. Investors in Corephotonics allegedly include among others  Samsung Ventures, Hong Kong’s billionaire Li Ka-shing and the Chinese telephone service provider CK Telecom. And to add a little spice to the situation, Corephotonics is represented by the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. In 2016 „The U.S. International Trade Commission publicly reprimanded Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan for ‘pervasive problems at the firm’ in safeguarding confidential business information from Apple Computers that it obtained while representing Samsung in patent litigation against the computer company“, as the Big Law Business reported.

And only a few days ago, Apple won a long-standing lawsuit against Samsung. In that lawsuit Samsung had infringed several patents of the Californian company.

Are you interested in patent or trademark protection for your company?

Our lawyers advise you individually and together with you develop the right strategy to protect your patent and trademark.

CAT-call_en

 

Source:
Lawsuit Corephonotics vs. Apple

rysadams /pixabay.com / CCO License  || xusenru /pixabay.com / CCO License   || helloolly /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconLicenses,  Patent Law,  Trademark Law Tag iconApple,  Samsung

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Licenses

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.