• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

IBM wins $83 million in licensing battle against Groupon

1. August 2018

Rejected licensing agreements were the focus of years of dispute between IBM and Discount Portal Groupon. On Friday, Groupon was taken in front of a U. S. Court sentenced to high payment for patent infringement. The patent dispute also sheds new light on the old question: to whom does the Internet belong?

Groupon denied licensing agreement

e-commerceClaimant International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) filed a patent infringement suit against Groupon, Inc. “(“Groupon”). IBM accused the defendant of having built its business model by using several IBM patents. Despite repeated attempts by IBM to negotiate, Groupon has refused to enter into licensing agreements with IBM.

Groupon operates local online retail marketplaces, which primarily offer discounts on goods and services via the website www.groupon.com and also use Groupon mobile applications to draw the attention of consumers to participating retailers.

License battle for patents in e-commerce

IBM alleged that Groupon infringed e-commerce patents previously licensed to other technology giants such as Amazon, Facebook, Google and Twitter. Groupon, in turn, argued that IBM overestimates the scope of protection covered by the disputed patents. Because at the heart of the debate are the basic building blocks of the World Wide Web.

In particular, the essential, permanent and fast connection between client and server in e-commerce is at stake. One of IBM’s contentious patents describes techniques for obtaining government information and a new method for recursively embedding status information in communication between clients and servers. This includes program modules that modify the hypertext – better known as HTML (Hypertext Markup Language, the text-based markup language for structuring).

In another contentious patent, IBM refers to the invention of so-called single sign-on technology, which is the basis for all authentication processes on user accounts on the Internet.

Licensing agreements can be the silver bullet

Since November 2011, IBM has claimed to have sought licensing agreements with the rapidly growing online marketplace operator Groupon, which it rejected. A similar lawsuit between IBM and The Priceline Group came to an end last year. IBM also filed a patent infringement suit against Priceline for the same four patents that IBM also refers to in the proceedings against Groupon. In the judgement of September 2017, IBM was partially victorious, but not on all patents. In December 2017, IBM finally announced that it had reached an agreement and a confidential settlement of the patent dispute between IBM and Priceline before the United States District Court for Delaware. Probably, the parties receive mutual patent licenses for the global patent portfolio of the respective company, using a patent cross-licensing modell.

The District Court of Delaware has now ruled on patent infringement and committed Groupon to pay $83 million to IBM. Considerations about the amount of the payment included the high development costs claimed by IBM on the one hand, but also the license revenues lost for years on the other. Whether this payment will ultimately be made remains to be seen. Because Groupon has already announced to consider an appeal.

Are you interested in patent protection and licensing agreements?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

 

 

Sources:

Case 16-cv-00122-LPS: IBM versus Groupon

Picture:

salcapolupo / pixabay.com / CC0 License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Patent Law,  Licenses Tag iconPatent,  Licensing,  IBM,  U. S. Court,  ecommerce,  U. S. Court of Delaware,  Licensing agreement,  Groupon,  Delaware,  license revenues,  patent cross-licensing

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

2. March 2021
BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form